About Cyber Digest
What this site is, how it is produced, and how sources are treated.
What this is
Cyber Digest is an independent publication covering publicly reported cybersecurity developments. It publishes a daily sector-by-sector roundup, aggregated monthly editions, a searchable story database and a reference wiki of incidents, vulnerabilities, actors and concepts. It is written for practitioners and analysts who need a fast, source-attributed read on what changed, and why it matters.
How it is produced
Everything on the site is generated from one corpus: the published digest archive and the story database behind it. Collection is largely automated, drafting and fact-checking support are AI-assisted, and output is reviewed before publication. The full disclosure — what is automated, what is AI-assisted, and what the ratings mean — is in the methodology & reading guide.
Nothing here is hand-entered. The homepage threat index, the sector counts, the reporting-activity charts and every per-story rating are computed from the database at build time, from the same data the Story DB and the digests publish.
How sources are treated
Every item carries a deep link to the specific article it came from — never a homepage
or a syndication redirect — and each source is graded by reliability tier. Confidence is
the gate: a single-source, unattributed claim is labelled Unverified and can
never be rated Critical severity or Observed urgency. Reported-but-not-verified
material is labelled as such rather than smoothed into the narrative.
What this site does not do
- It does not predict attacks. Ratings describe the severity and urgency of already reported activity, and are an ordinal heuristic — not a probability, and not a measure of real-world danger.
- It does not give security, legal or investment advice.
- It runs no advertising and no cross-site tracking, and collects no visitor data — see the privacy policy.
- It does not publish an unattributed claim as fact to fill a gap in a quiet news cycle.
Corrections
Factual errors are fixed and disclosed rather than silently overwritten, with the original claim recorded alongside the correction — see corrections & retractions. If a headline, date, figure or attribution here is wrong, it will be corrected against the source.
Rights and reuse
The site's own analysis, ratings and build code are original; the news being summarised belongs to the outlets that reported it, and every item links back so attribution and traffic stay with the source. See licensing & terms.
Reporting a security issue
Vulnerability reports about this site itself go to the address published in security.txt (RFC 9116) — not through the corrections channel.